Reading In Bed Piano Chords

Invitation to learn Quechua Southern Peru (Election 2006)

DESCONTENTO A PUNTO DE EXPLOTAR

Carlos Quiroz C.
qc.carlos@gmail.com
Miembro honorario MIP-PERU
Activista de la indianidad en EEUU
Washington DC

Es lamentable como las elecciones recientes podrian causar la desunion de nuestro pais. No es mi deseo personal ver a nuestro Peru dividido, pero los pueblos del Sur peruano at this time are very unhappy with the results that have been decided by votes on the north coast, Lima and abroad. The departments that have voted for Ollanta Humala are tired Lima decide for them and take away the currency that originate in their lands to mining, foreign tourism, natural gas, oil, water, fisheries, livestock, etc.. (Up to Cusco where the Camisea has voted overwhelmingly for Ollanta). Cajamarca, the department has the largest gold mine in the world also vote for Ollanta. I listen to opinions of many Peruvians in the south and the separation is an outrageous prediction will say a lot, but you can not really hide. Please read the document at the end of the image.

SEE RATES IN Ollanta GANOY SEE THE REST OF DEPARTMENTS

Socialist Movement Apurímac

Front Regional Institutions Department of Apurimac - FEDIRAP - TO Andean, workers, laborers, social organizations, peasant organizations, neighborhood organizations, HOUSEWIVES, ORGANIZATIONS AND WOMEN IN GENERAL Try out APURMEÑO

The Apurimeños and left nationalists, democrats and liberals constituted Departmental Front regional institutions FEDIRAP Apurimac, we went to the family and Peruvian Apurimeña to make public the conformation of this face, recognizing in it the organized force of change in our country. The FEDIRAP is the result of the long struggle of the people Apurimeño by having a massive force to transform Peru into a country free from social injustice and master of his fate.

This June 4, day of the second round, is a day of enormous significance. We have before us a choice between continuity and change. Among those who persist in losing five more years and instituted policies and a failed model and as the neo-liberal, and those who opt for replacement by a new model, an alternative model, based on what Peru needs, their potentials and possibilities, on the strength of its people, understanding that the future starts today.

This restoration of collective rights should have been given five years of President Alejandro Toledo will shortly complete its term. The government opted for continuity with the policy of Alberto Fujimori. Consequently, the transition from dictatorship to democracy, was stopped by five years, and we are now as in 2000-2001. What purports to be maintained by the candidate for re-election, Alan Garcia Pérez.

Unlike Ollanta Humala, who has signed an explicit commitment to social organizations, Alan Garcia Perez has not done so. And the significance of this lack of commitment is, by implication, the obvious desire to continue the policy of Alejandro Toledo is not the same policy of Alberto Fujimori, ie neo-liberal policy.

REMEMBER THE STORY IS NOT DONE "DIRTY WAR"

When recalling the disastrous five-year period 1985-1990, the defenders of García Pérez (starting with the media communication) claim in unison, dirty war!, when there is more to make history, remember the past in order not to relive. But not only is history, indeed, recent history is, what just happened in the five years from 2001 to 2006, where the party of Alan Garcia has played "wall" with the outgoing government of Alejandro Toledo. Or NOT ABSOLUTE MAJORITY VOTE TO SETTLE FOR EFFECT "mirror" of the Law 20530? Or NOT systematic boycott APPROVAL OF THE AFP DISAFFILIATION FREE? Or not in fact supported the signing of Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the United States? In general, Alan García Perez and his party have compromised with the Toledo in five years. Toledo saving the vacancy when he was in danger, not opening the mouth when the political agenda put on the table serious national problems that everyone will remember.

What did Alan García and APRA has done in five years? Play to the opposition. Pretending that it is against the government's actions when in reality they are in favor. Have used the theme of the eight hour work day, as if a legal issue, as he was a management issue, a matter of government. Formally, the eight hours have been changed. And what had to do was address the corporate abuses that did not meet the day, change the terms of existing social and economic environment that make it difficult or almost impossible for the full observance of a law that exists but is not met, or are violent artfully regulations adopted as in the Banco de la Nacion. It has become a demagogic use of the theme of "SERVICES", which were instituted in the period of the APRA government.

ALAN GARCIA OBJECT TO RECOVER OUR NATURAL RESOURCES AND DOWN THE PRICE OF PETROL AND GAS DOSMESTICO

APRA opposed to the revision of contracts. Why not defend the validity of the 1979 Constitution. Its exact position is to maintain the 1993 Constitution, since it holds contracts with the multinationals. Because they are committed (the case of mining Misquichilca Barrel, Mercedes Cabanillas, and Yanacocha, Xtrata Bambas in Apurimac, with miners who do not pay royalties. They also oppose any improvement, lowering gas prices or oil because here are tied by the side of the Constitution Fujimori, who is the supreme legal tool "shielding" all extraordinary benefits granted to large companies the past decade.

This defense of the Constitution of 1993, also precludes any improvement in the employment status of workers. Because in doing so and to oppose the Constitution of 1979, we blocked the return of job stability, and therefore the recovery of the legislation on dismissals for just causes and verified, and the reaffirmation of conventions involving hours and other conditions work.

This is the national political scene, fellow workers, and against this background we have to make a choice, which is that of Peru, hoisted by the nationalist cause that defends. There is no argument to stop a vote for Ollanta Peru. All the "arguments" of anti-Ollanta dirty war have fallen one by one. Since the argument of collective and human rights, put forward by those who never were interested in the subject, on the contrary, agreed with the extreme solution to the issue of internal war. The clearest evidence against it is the defense of Ollanta Humala exerted by Carlos Escobar, the Cayara prosecutor, as counsel of Ollanta. So did the arguments of "sponsorship" of the government of Hugo Chavez, who is only supported by a Bolivarian nationalist process, overshadowed by the patronage of Bush and his ambassador, openly involved, by the power they have, in the Peruvian national policy (Jones used a strategy of provocation against the Bolivarian nobody, absolutely nobody in the media hacks have been criticized for the impact on the deterioration of relations between brotherly countries.) The family issues have been falling one after another, so contemptible of the themes used.

THE APRA lay off workers to place their servile CARNETIZADOS AND ALWAYS WITH THE FAMOUS RATIONALIZATION

Those are the options, co workers, to which there are colleagues who by intimidation (persuaded by the media campaign are afraid of being fired) or "make little something" are echoing the siren song of APRA. Big mistake, comrades, what APRA would, now that he came to power, would be dismissed, first, to contract, then the "non-personal", and finally to the appointed (to whom they look for any pretext ) to use their places for the number of registered voters that have APRA 650.000 nationally (see Report RV. No. 045-2006-PAP-CEN-DOM-WBC, 25/04/2006). Breaking fears peers. Nationalism has no membership lists as APRA has them. Support for the nationalist cause has no such motivation, as low as treacherous, this is called APRISTIZACIÓN of the state apparatus. APRA, as a pseudo-democratic totalitarian tendencies, has this practice, wanting to have full control of the state apparatus. That's part of history. Takeover of the union movement, the state takeover. Their methods, and have not changed, if not for the worse. Now, come with everything ready to make the best five years of seeking to conquer without being accountable to anyone.

For a dignified life for the Peruvian people
For a village worthy of identity
Apurimac Lima June 5, 2006

On the Nationalist Provisional Committee

APURIMAC is standing and will never stoop to the hypocrisy of the bourgeoisie of neo-liberal SYSTEM